Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Effect of Single-Segment versus Two-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation on Postoperative Sagittal Balance and Cranial Adjacent Segment Disease in L4-L5 Spondylolisthesis.

Created on 30 Sep 2026

Authors

R Acikalin, M Ferat, C Sezer, I Istemen, M Harput, D Babaoglan

Published in

Nigerian journal of clinical practice. Volume 29. Issue 9. Pages 966-972. Sep 01, 2026. Epub Sep 30, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of single-segment versus two-segment pedicle screw fixation on adjacent segment disease (ASDis) and lumbar sagittal balance in patients with L4-L5 spondylolisthesis.
This retrospective study included 35 patients who underwent lumbar fusion for L4-L5 spondylolisthesis between January 2020 and January 2025. Patients were divided into single-segment (SS) and two-segment (TS) groups: SS (L4-L5 fusion, n = 19) and TS (L3-L4-L5 fusion, n = 16). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological parameters, including lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and sacral slope (SCS), were measured. Adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) was evaluated using Modified Pfirrmann Grades. The follow-up period was 6 months postoperatively.
Both groups showed significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores postoperatively. At 6-month follow-up, the TS group demonstrated greater improvement (VAS: P =0.028; ODI: P =0.042). The SS group exhibited higher Pfirrmann scores, indicating greater ASDeg, compared to the TS group ( P < 0.05). The TS group showed better restoration of LL and SVA at final follow-up, though differences were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05).
Both single-segment and two-segment fixation improve clinical and radiological outcomes in L4-L5 spondylolisthesis. However, two-segment fixation offers advantages in preventing adjacent-segment degeneration and maintaining radiographic parameters.

PMID:
42813866
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement