Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association of physiological discordance between fractional flow reserve and non-hyperaemic pressure ratios with lipid-rich plaque burden.

Created on 30 Sep 2026

Authors

Hirohiko Aikawa, Kota Murai, Yu Kataoka, Yuriko Nakaoku, Soshiro Ogata, Kentaro Mitsui, Takamasa Iwai, Kenichiro Sawada, Hideo Matama, Hiroyuki Miura, Satoshi Honda, Masashi Fujino, Shuichi Yoneda, Kazuhiro Nakao, Kensuke Takagi, Yasuhide Asaumi, Kunihiro Nishimura, Teruo Noguchi

Published in

European heart journal open. Volume 6. Issue 5. Pages oeag155. Epub Sep 18, 2026.

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and non-hyperaemic pressure ratios (NHPRs) frequently yield discordant results in clinical practice, yet the mechanisms underlying this mismatch remain uncertain. Plaque composition has been suggested to influence FFR, raising the possibility that discordance reflects the features of lipid-rich plaque (LRP). This study aimed to investigate whether physiological discordance between FFR and NHPR is associated with increased lipid burden.
We retrospectively analysed 217 intermediate coronary lesions from 189 patients who underwent FFR, NHPR, and near-infrared spectroscopy with intravascular ultrasound imaging. Lesions were classified using established cut-offs for FFR (0.80) and NHPR (0.89). Lipid burden was quantified by the maximum lipid core burden index within any 4-mm segment (maxLCBI4mm). Lipid-rich plaque was defined as maxLCBI4mm > 400. The clinical endpoint was 3-year target vessel failure (TVF). Physiological discordance occurred in 24.0% of lesions, predominantly as an FFR+/NHPR- pattern (19.8%). FFR was independently associated with maxLCBI4mm [β, 65.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 29.0-101.5; P < 0.001], whereas NHPR was not (β, 16.5; 95% CI, -15.9 to 49.0; P = 0.316). The FFR+/NHPR- group demonstrated the highest maxLCBI4mm (525 ± 201) and the greatest prevalence of LRP (65.1%; both P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the FFR+/NHPR- pattern independently predicted LRP [adjusted odds ratio, 6.12; 95% CI, 1.20-31.28; P = 0.030]. TVF occurrences did not differ significantly across physiological groups.
FFR+/NHPR- lesions exhibit markedly greater lipid burden, suggesting that hyperaemia-based indices better capture plaque vulnerability than resting physiology. This pattern may serve as a marker of plaque vulnerability, suggesting that deferral of FFR+/NHPR- lesions could warrant caution given their higher lipid burden.

PMID:
42812886
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement