Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Bridging the Theory-Practice Gap in Radiography Education: A Cross-Sectional Study of Clinical Placement Experiences.

Created on 30 Sep 2026

Authors

Y Madkhali

Published in

Nigerian journal of clinical practice. Volume 29. Issue 9. Pages 997-1002. Sep 01, 2026. Epub Sep 30, 2026.

Abstract

Clinical placements are vital in radiography education, enabling students to apply theoretical knowledge in real settings. However, a theory-practice gap often exists, which is the discrepancy between academic learning and clinical application.
To assess radiography students' perceptions of the theory-practice gap and factors associated with their clinical skill development.
A cross-sectional study involving radiography students was conducted, using a Likert-scale questionnaire to assess the alignment between academic preparation and clinical practice. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Spearman's correlation, and linear regression to evaluate perceived gaps and predictors of skill development.
Of 121 students (62.8% female, 37.2% male), the mean clinical placement experience score was 3.46. The university preparation rated significantly above neutral ( P < 0.001), while the theory-practice gap was below neutral ( P = 0.002). A negative correlation was noted between perceived university preparation and the gap (rho = -0.290, P = 0.001). Linear regression showed that perceived relevance of courses (B = 0.245, P < 0.001) and confidence in performing routine exams (B = 0.259, P < 0.001) were significant predictors of skill development, explaining 22% of the variance (R² = 0.2).
Although students experienced a theory-practice gap, improved academic preparation, frequent clinical exposure, and opportunities for routine exams enhanced perceived skills. Enhancing the connection between academic curricula and clinical training could help bridge this gap and improve learning outcomes.

PMID:
42813870
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Sep 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 17
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement