Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association Between Younger Age and Higher Scores in Nomophobia and Problematic Internet Use: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Created on 01 Oct 2026

Authors

Cesar Copaja-Corzo, Rodrigo Flores-Palacios, Cielo A Estela-Fernandez, Sandra Pajares-Centeno, Brayan Miranda-Chavez, Javier Flores-Cohaila

Published in

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. Volume 63. Pages 469580261468779. Epub Sep 30, 2026.

Abstract

IntroductionThe widespread use of smartphones and digital platforms has increased the risk of technological addictions among university students. This study aimed to determine the inverse association between age and the severity of nomophobia and problematic internet use among health sciences students.MethodsCross-sectional analytical study conducted among health sciences students (medicine, dentistry, and medical technology) at a university in Peru. We evaluated the inverse association between age factors and scores from the Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q) and the Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire (PIU-Q) using crude and adjusted linear regression models.ResultsWe included 502 health sciences students, 59.2% of whom were women, with a median age of 21 (interquartile range: 19 to 23) years. The prevalence of moderate to severe nomophobia was 59.3%, and the median PIU-Q score was 41 (IQR: 34-50). Multivariable linear regression confirmed that younger age was significantly associated with higher severity: students aged 17-20 years had higher NMP-Q scores (βa: 11.0; 5.7 to 16.0) and higher PIU-Q scores (βa:3.4; 1.0 to 5.8) compared to those over 23 years.ConclusionThere is a significant inverse association between age and the severity of nomophobia and problematic internet use. These findings suggest that age factors are critical in digital health, requiring targeted interventions for younger smartphone users to mitigate addictive behaviors.

PMID:
42814993
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement