Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cumulative expression of the two Lyn isoforms creates a threshold for macrophage signaling in the absence of receptor engagement.

Created on 01 Oct 2026

Authors

S Erandika Senevirathne, Siyu Jin, Carter E Sellner, Silvia Toledo Ramos, Tanya S Freedman

Published in

Journal of leukocyte biology. Oct 01, 2026. Epub Oct 01, 2026.

Abstract

It has been unclear whether phenotypic differences between LynA and LynB knockout mice, each expressing only one splice form of the Src-family kinase (SFK) Lyn, are due to isoform-specific functions or dose effects from differences in overall Lyn expression. To assess the functions of LynA and LynB, we generated a genetic series in which LynA and LynB expression levels vary independently, allowing us to test whether upregulation of one Lyn isoform could compensate for loss of the other. We used macrophages from this dose series to test signaling at steady state and in response to pharmacological pan-SFK activation. We found that LynA and LynB are equally capable of phosphorylating the positive-regulatory tyrosine kinase Syk and the negative-regulatory inositol phosphatase SHIP1, to a level determined by the cumulative expression level of LynA + LynB at steady state. Despite the dose-dependence of steady-state and induced phosphorylation of upstream signaling intermediates, Erk and Akt signaling in response to pan-SFK activation is enabled by any amount of Lyn expression, insensitive to further upregulation of either isoform. Thus, expression of either LynA or LynB at steady state leads to balanced potential for positive-regulatory and negative-regulatory signaling, setting a maximal response in the absence of a true microbial encounter.

PMID:
42817861
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement