Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Transfer-Aided Deep Learning for Life Cycle Assessment Prediction of Precursor Molecules.

Created on 01 Oct 2026

Authors

Michael Y Zhou, Frank Roschangar, Fabian Stiefel, Philip Schulze, Alexei A Lapkin

Published in

ChemSusChem. Volume 19. Issue 19. Pages e71053. Oct 14, 2026.

Abstract

To date the environmental impacts of production of most chemicals are unknown, hindering sustainable process evaluation and design. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is the most comprehensive method for estimating these environmental impacts but existing LCA databases cover a small fraction of the industrial chemicals. Environmental impact prediction models promise to bridge this gap; several models were published, with the apparent limitations of limited accuracy and applicability. The very small number of available LCA datasets for industrial chemicals is the major issue for developing environmental impact prediction models; this limits the domain of applicability and accuracy of the models. Here we show that a machine learning approach using transfer learning partially addresses these limitations. We found supervised pretraining on molecular price data increases model accuracy for three different deep learning model architectures, for two out of three different environmental impact categories. Taking the mean for model architectures, across all impacts, transfer learning increases R2 by 0.11, and reduces mean percentage absolute error by 2.5%. Our most accurate model for carbon footprint prediction achieves an R2 of 0.62, similar to existing literature benchmarks, and an overall prediction error of 22% for the organic precursors for six active pharmaceutical ingredients.

PMID:
42817642
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 19
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement