Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

PixelPaws: a low-cost, open-source integrated platform for automated scoring of mouse behaviors.

Created on 01 Oct 2026

Authors

Richard A Slivicki, Hanyun Wang, Juliet M Mwirigi, Kayla Kucz, Hunter Hua, Meaghan C Creed, Robert W Gereau

Published in

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. Sep 24, 2026. Epub Sep 24, 2026.

Abstract

Behavioral scoring is central to preclinical pain research but is typically performed manually, which is inherently low-throughput and subject to variability between observers. Automated alternatives exist, but cost and programming expertise limit adoption beyond the laboratories that build them. Here we describe PixelPaws, an open-source platform combining a near-infrared imaging enclosure built from consumer parts for under $300, multi-camera acquisition software, a bundled pose-estimation network, and eight classifiers in a graphical user interface. We evaluated the platform across standard assays of pain, itch, and opioid withdrawal. Licking, scratching, and jumping classifiers were validated against trained human observers by leave-one-session-out evaluation. In the formalin assay, classifier-scored licking followed the expected biphasic time course and was reduced dose-dependently by oxycodone, with a phase 2 potency estimate comparable to blinded manual scoring. Chloroquine roughly tripled scratching, and naloxone precipitated a burst of jumping in oxycodone-treated mice. From the same recordings we derived a set of paw contour metrics. Contour intensity fell after formalin and tracked the oxycodone dose series, and contour area shifted toward symmetry after oxycodone in nerve-injured mice. Behavioral sequencing revealed distinct changes in the transi.

PMID:
42817958
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 16
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement