High-risk without safeguards? The EU AI Act and the push for deregulation of medical AI.

Authors

Hannah Van Kolfschooten, Barry Solaiman, Daria Onitiu

Published in

BMJ digital health & AI. Volume 2. Issue 1. Pages e000184. Epub Sep 30, 2026.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in clinical decision-making, yet recent proposals to simplify the European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) have reopened the question of whether AI-enabled medical devices should remain subject to the AI Act's full high-risk regime. Under the current framework, AI-enabled medical devices are regulated through a combination of sectoral medical device legislation (the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR)) and additional AI-specific safeguards contained in the AI Act. This narrative review analyses the Health Innovation Package and related legislative developments under the EU simplification agenda and examines their impact on the relationship between the AI Act and medical device law. It shows that the proposed reform would retain the high-risk classification of AI-enabled medical devices while removing most associated AI Act obligations. In effect, this decouples risk classification from the safeguards that give it regulatory meaning, including requirements on data governance, risk management, human oversight and postmarket monitoring. Rather than resolving regulatory overlap, the amendments shift the centre of gravity back to product-focused medical device law without ensuring equivalent AI-specific safeguards. These changes may narrow attention to fundamental rights, weaken oversight in clinical use and increase legal uncertainty regarding accountability and responsibility. In a domain where AI systems directly shape clinical decisions and patient outcomes, these changes risk undermining the conditions for safe, equitable and accountable deployment of medical AI.

PMID:
42825232
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.