Challenges in glaucoma diagnosis in small optic discs: An OCT-based analysis.

Authors

Serap Yildiz, Seyda Ugurlu Karadeniz

Published in

Medicine. Volume 105. Issue 40. Pages e50866. Oct 02, 2026.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess how optic disc (OD) size influences structural and functional tests in patients with glaucoma with small and normal-sized discs and to compare the sensitivities of these tests. The study comprised 182 eyes, including 109 eyes of 73 patients diagnosed with glaucoma and 73 eyes of 41 healthy subjects. Eyes were classified according to OD size as either small (<1.6 mm2) or normal (1.6-2.1 mm2). Optic nerve head parameters, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, and macular ganglion cell analysis were assessed using Cirrus 4000 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The sensitivities of RNFL, macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), and visual field parameters were evaluated using logistic receiver operating characteristic regression analysis. The mean ages of the patients and controls were 65.48 ± 7.94 years and 65.22 ± 6.55 years, respectively (P = .859). The mean disc diameter was 1.48 ± 0.11 mm in the small-disc group and 1.86 ± 0.16 mm in the normal-disc group. The mean deviation values were -5.52 ± 4.81 and -4.54 ± 3.73 in the small- and normal-disc groups, respectively (P = .268). Among patients with glaucoma and small ODs, GCIPL parameters (mean, minimum, superior, and inferior hemifield values) demonstrated greater sensitivity than RNFL parameters. In contrast, RNFL parameters (average, superior, inferior, and corresponding hemifield values) showed greater sensitivity than GCIPL parameters in patients with normal-sized ODs. Macular structural parameters demonstrated higher sensitivity for glaucoma diagnosis in patients with small ODs. However, a comprehensive assessment integrating both macular and peripapillary structural parameters may improve diagnostic accuracy by providing complementary information in these patients.

PMID:
42826264
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.