Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Practices for initiating a conversation about fear of cancer recurrence after cancer treatment: A conversation analytic study of gynae-oncology outpatient consultations.

Created on 03 Oct 2026

Authors

D'arcy Malady-Meek, Stuart Ekberg, Bronwyn Jennings, Nisha Jagasia, Allan 'Ben' Smith, Elizabeth A Johnston

Published in

Patient education and counseling. Volume 154. Pages 110327. Sep 30, 2026. Epub Sep 30, 2026.

Abstract

Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a top-rated concern and unmet need for support among gynaecological cancer patients yet seldom discussed during healthcare consultations. Clinicians report several challenges in initiating conversations about FCR with patients and limited practical guidance is available.
This study aimed to identify communication practices for initiating conversations about FCR during outpatient consultations after treatment for gynaecological cancer.
A collection of 30 audio-recorded outpatient consultations, involving 4 gynae-oncology clinicians, 30 people who had completed treatment for endometrial or ovarian cancer, and 11 accompanying family members and friends, were reviewed to identify instances where FCR was discussed. These instances were analysed using conversation analysis.
Six of the 30 consultations, all involving the same gynae-oncology clinician, included talk about FCR. Two recurrent communication practices were used to initiate these conversations: (1) Universal claims (e.g., "I always ask…") framed talk about FCR as a routine part of post-treatment follow-up for all gynaecological cancer patients, and (2) General claims (e.g., "Some people find that…") normalised FCR post-treatment and provided opportunity for the patient to indicate if FCR was relevant to them and to describe their experience. Both practices provided avenues for the gynae-oncology clinician to discuss available support for FCR.
FCR was not regularly discussed in this collection of recordings, reflecting previous reports of clinical practice. Nonetheless, direct observation and detailed analysis of real-word consultations where FCR was discussed identified two simple strategies that clinicians can use to initiate these conversations. First, universal claims can shift the conversation to FCR specifically and frame this talk as routine. Second, general claims normalise FCR and invite patients to share their experiences. Future research could investigate use of these practices across multiple clinicians and patient groups and examine the impact of FCR conversations for patients and families.

PMID:
42826608
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement