Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Bubbles or microparticles: which are the main initial cause of decompression illness?

Created on 03 Oct 2026

Authors

Ran Arieli

Published in

Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc. Volume 53. Issue 3. Pages 535-540.

Abstract

There are two leading schools of thought on the mechanism that causes decompression illness (DCI). The old school attributes DCI to decompression bubbles, while the new school, mostly led by S. Thom, attributes DCI mainly to microparticles (MP).
Microparticles were found to be elevated at high pressures before decompression and, more so, after decompression. Decompression MP activate neutrophils and platelets, enhance inflammation, stimulate proinflammatory cytokines, and proto-coagulant activity. The predominant presence of endothelial MP is obvious. It was suggested that large MP contain a gas phase of nitric oxide (NO) and its derivatives and serve as gas micronuclei for decompression bubbles. Formation of a gas phase from very soluble NO is unlikely.
Bubbling is crucial in the decompression from depth, and one cannot simply shoot up from the depth to the surface. The inconsistency between the relations of venous bubbles and DCI can be related to DCI unrelated to shunted/non-shunted venous bubbles, like distal arterial bubbles and local bubble formation. It was suggested that a detached bubble tears off the underlying endothelial cells, and when the bubble becomes lodged in the lung, it diminishes to a gas-containing microparticle enveloped by an endothelial membrane.
The main initial cause for DCI is the formation of decompression bubbles, and microparticles add to the injury but would not cause DCI without decompression bubbles.

PMID:
42826432
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Oct 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement