Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing penetrating needling and cognitive behavioral therapy for subjective tinnitus.

Created on 03 Oct 2026

Authors

Shasha Yang, Wanting Xu, Xuejun Guo, Qinwei Fu, Hao Liang, Qian Wang, Jing Wu

Published in

Frontiers in neurology. Volume 17. Pages 1877858. Epub Sep 18, 2026.

Abstract

To describe the protocol for a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of penetrating needling compared with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in patients with subjective tinnitus.
This protocol describes a proposed assessor- and analyst-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. A total of 72 participants will be randomized 1:1 to a treatment group receiving penetrating needling plus health education or a control group receiving CBT plus health education. Penetrating needling will be administered five times weekly for two consecutive weeks (10 sessions). The primary outcomes are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for tinnitus loudness. Secondary outcomes include the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA). Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after one week of treatment, after two weeks of treatment, and at a 4-week follow-up (by telephone, online, or in clinic).
As CBT is an established standard of care, this proposed parallel-group trial is designed to specifically evaluate the efficacy of penetrating needling. The findings of this protocol are expected to provide rigorous, high-quality evidence to determine the viability of penetrating needling as a neuromodulatory alternative for subjective tinnitus.
http://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn/, ITMCTR2024000264.

PMID:
42827440
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement