Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Automated Quantification of 3-D Carotid Ultrasound Vessel Wall Texture Change Predicts Vascular Events.

Created on 04 Oct 2026

Authors

Zhaozheng Chen, Bernard Chiu

Published in

Ultrasound in medicine & biology. Oct 04, 2026. Epub Oct 04, 2026.

Abstract

To reduce reliance on labor-intensive and operator-dependent explicit plaque segmentation, we evaluated whether a texture-change score (ΔTexture) derived from semi-automated 3-D ultrasound (3-DUS) vessel wall segmentation predicts vascular events better than baseline vessel wall texture (BL-Texture), vessel wall volume change (ΔVWV) and Framingham risk score.
3-DUS images were acquired from 272 patients with carotid atherosclerosis at baseline and 1 y later. Vessel walls were delineated using a validated, minimally user-initialized segmentation workflow. Longitudinal texture change was summarized as vessel wall ΔTexture and compared with BL-Texture, ΔVWV and Framingham risk score. Patients were followed for up to 5 y (median, 3.16 y) for myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack and stroke.
ΔTexture and BL-Texture predicted vascular events (log-rank, p < 0.001 for both), whereas ΔVWV did not. No event occurred in the lowest-risk tertile of ΔTexture. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ΔTexture was 0.89, compared with 0.82 for BL-Texture, 0.53 for ΔVWV and 0.53 for Framingham risk score. In Cox regression, ΔTexture (median hazard ratio, 4.05; p < 0.001) and BL-Texture (median hazard ratio, 3.63; p < 0.001) were significant predictors, whereas ΔVWV and Framingham risk score were not.
Vessel wall ΔTexture derived from minimally user-initialized 3-DUS vessel wall segmentation predicted vascular events better than ΔVWV and Framingham risk score. This approach provides a scalable imaging biomarker for vascular event risk assessment without requiring explicit plaque segmentation.

PMID:
42829280
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 27
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement