Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Sex, age, and race representation in electromyography research: A cross-sectional methodological survey.

Created on 04 Oct 2026

Authors

Bingle Li, Xinrui Tang, Junbo Xu, Alejandra Aranceta-Garza

Published in

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology. Volume 91. Pages 103218. Sep 29, 2026. Epub Sep 29, 2026.

Abstract

Surface electromyography (sEMG) is widely utilized in biomechanics and human-computer interaction. Modern sEMG systems rely on machine learning models , whose generalization heavily depends on physiological variations linked to sex, age, and ancestry, though these are often unexplored.
This survey critically appraises how demographic variables (sex, age, race) are reported in primary sEMG studies and quantifies cohort diversity at both aggregate and individual-study levels.
We analyzed a stratified random sample of 377 sEMG articles (January 2000-April 2026) from PubMed and IEEE Xplore. A validated large-language-model workflow extracted demographic data to compute reporting rates, gender imbalance indices, and age spans.
Overall reporting rates were 87.5% for gender, 89.9% for age, and 2.6% for race. Despite macroscopic sex balance, 49.5% of individual studies exhibited severe gender imbalance. Furthermore, cohorts overwhelmingly concentrated on young adults (19-35 years) with narrow age bands, revealing pronounced homogenization.
These findings underscore a critical demographic blind spot in current sEMG research. To ensure the safety, robustness, and true generalizability of intelligent neural interfaces across heterogeneous real-world populations, there is an urgent need to mandate structured demographic reporting standards and explicitly define the fairness boundaries of algorithm models.

PMID:
42828909
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement