Gut-Brain Axis in Comorbid Constipation and Mood Disorders: Navigating the Efficacy-Tolerability Dilemma Through Emerging Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors

Mei Tu, Yangfeng Huang

Published in

International journal of general medicine. Volume 19. Pages 634121. Epub Sep 29, 2026.

Abstract

The comorbidity of constipation and mood disorders (anxiety/depression) creates a vicious cycle of symptom superposition and treatment resistance. The persistent "efficacy-tolerability" dilemma-whereby effective treatment for one condition may exacerbate the other-remains unresolved.
This narrative review is based on a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (2015-2026), focusing on epidemiology, gut-brain axis mechanisms, pharmacotherapy limitations, and emerging strategies. The search formula was: ("constipation" OR "functional constipation") AND ("mood disorders" OR "anxiety" OR "depression") AND ("gut-brain axis" OR "microbiota" OR "pharmacotherapy").
Constipation and mood disorders show a bidirectional association, supported by recent Mendelian randomization studies. Pathogenesis involves central/enteric nervous system dysfunction, microbiota imbalance, and inflammatory mediators. Conventional drugs (eg, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs], stimulant laxatives) may worsen one condition while treating the other. Preliminary evidence suggests gut-brain axis-targeted therapies-including 5-hydroxytryptamine type 4 (5-HT4) receptor agonists, psychobiotics, and multidisciplinary team models-may improve outcomes, but most findings remain exploratory.
Overcoming the dilemma requires mechanism-oriented drug selection, optimized combination regimens, and individualized management. Future efforts should accelerate multi-target drug trials, multi-omics-based precision models, and multidisciplinary team implementation. The evidence base remains limited, with few large randomized controlled trials specifically targeting the comorbid population. Readers should interpret all quantitative estimates with caution, as they derive from heterogeneous study designs.

PMID:
42829726
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.