Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The effects of blood flow restriction training on lower limb motor function and balance in stroke patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Created on 05 Oct 2026

Authors

Fenghao Ma, Qian Qian, Taiyang Liu, Qi Qi, Jiayou Wang, Chaoyang Guo, Jiabao Kang, Shouxin Lu, Yan Xu, Duchun Zeng, Nan Wang, Lingjing Jin, Ronghua Hong

Published in

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Oct 04, 2026. Epub Oct 04, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) training, delivered as BFR‑walking or low‑load resistance training with BFR (LL‑BFR), on lower limb motor function and balance in stroke survivors.
A single-blind randomized clinical trial.
Inpatient intensive rehabilitation unit.
Ninety-six stroke patients had a mean (SD) age of 55.80 (13.17) years, and 27% were female.
Participants were allocated 1:1:1 to undergo a 3-week intervention (five sessions/week) consisting of either walking without BFR (Control), BFR-walking (120 mmHg cuff pressure), or LL-BFR (120 mmHg low-load resistance training at 20% 1RM). All received concurrent standard rehabilitation.
The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity (FMA-LE), with secondary outcomes including the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test (30sSTS), and Limits of Stability.
Significant Group × Time interactions were found for FMA‑LE (F [2, 93.054] =8.418, P<0.001, η²p=0.153), BBS (F [2, 93.000]=4.615, P=0.012, η²p=0.090), TUG (F [2, 93.000]=9.121, P<0.001, η²p=0.164), and 30sSTS (F [2, 93.000]=26.020, P<0.001, η²p=0.359). Both BFR‑Walking (adjusted mean difference vs. control: 1.66 points; 95% CI, 0.27 to 3.04; P=0.010) and LL‑BFR (2.25 points; 95% CI, 0.86 to 3.64; P<0.001) showed greater FMA‑LE improvements than control, with no difference between BFR modalities (P=0.165). Both BFR groups outperformed control on BBS, TUG, and 30sSTS (all P<0.05). Responder analysis showed 34.4% of LL‑BFR participants achieved FMA‑LE MCID (≥4 points) versus 15.6% in control (P=0.04). No serious adverse events occurred.
A 3‑week BFR‑Walking or LL‑BFR regimen improved balance and mobility beyond conventional training. Although the average improvement is modest, a significantly greater number of patients may achieve clinically meaningful improvement, warranting larger, longer‑term trials before routine clinical use.

PMID:
42830125
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 31
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement