Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Biomechanical Responses to Level, Uphill, and Downhill Running Segments During an Outdoor Marathon.

Created on 05 Oct 2026

Authors

Ransi S S Subasinghe Arachchige, Ke Hu, Yannis Pitsiladis, Carl James, Roy T H Cheung

Published in

European journal of sport science. Volume 26. Issue 11. Pages e70261.

Abstract

This study investigated running biomechanics across varying slopes during a mass-participation road marathon. Although laboratory studies suggest specific gait modifications occur in response to varying slopes, data from outdoor competitive environments remain scarce. We monitored 39 distance runners using shoe-mounted inertial measurement units to capture spatiotemporal, footstrike, and wearable-derived loading data across level, uphill (+3%), and downhill (-3%) segments of the 2025 Hong Kong Marathon. Results demonstrated slope-dependent modifications, with uphill running characterized by slower velocity (-0.29 m/s, Cohen's d = -1.98), shorter stride length (-0.15 m, d = -1.55), and lower cadence (-5.00 steps/min, d = -1.21) compared with level ground (p < 0.001). Kinematically, participants adopted a more anterior footstrike pattern uphill (d = 1.48) and a more posterior footstrike pattern downhill (d = -0.62) relative to level running (p < 0.05). Analysis of wearable-derived loading metrics showed no differences across slope conditions once running velocity was included as a covariate. Running velocity emerged as the primary determinant of braking, impact, and shock accelerations, indicating that differences in self-selected running velocity may contribute substantially to loading responses across varying slopes during overground running. These findings highlight a discrepancy between controlled laboratory simulations and competitive overground running, emphasizing the role of wearable technology in capturing ecologically valid gait alterations to different terrains.

PMID:
42831284
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement