Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Benefits of 6-weeks high-intensity circuit training with or without blood flow restriction on physical fitness in active males: A randomized controlled trial.

Created on 05 Oct 2026

Authors

Yun-Rong Yang, Chen-Meng Goh, Chin-Yu Lin, Chu Chen, Chi-Hsueh Pan, Ching-Feng Cheng

Published in

Journal of exercise science and fitness. Volume 24. Issue 4. Pages 200525. Epub Sep 20, 2026.

Abstract

To investigate the effects of a 6-weeks 7-min workout (7 MW), with and without blood flow restriction (BFR), on physical fitness.
Thirty-three active healthy males (age: 23.3 ± 2.6 yr; body mass index: 22.5 ± 1.9 kg m-2) were randomly assigned to 7 MW, 7 MW-BFR (150 mmHg cuff pressure applied to proximal thighs), or control (CON) groups. 7 MW, comprising 12 bodyweight exercises, was performed 3 times per week, with one set during weeks 1-3 and two sets during weeks 4-6. Outcomes included body fat percentage (%BF), thigh circumference (TC), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), isometric mid-thigh pull variables (peak [PF] and mean [MF] force, and maximal rate of force development [RFDmax]), and countermovement jump (CMJ) height.
Adjusting for baseline values, post-intervention VO2max was higher in 7 MW (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 2.1-5.7 mL kg-1·min-1) and 7 MW-BFR (p = 0.002, 95% CI: 1.3-4.9 mL kg-1·min-1) than in CON. PF and MF were greater in both training groups than in CON, with larger effects in 7 MW-BFR (PF: p < 0.001, d = 1.21, 95% CI: 155-451 N; MF: p < 0.001, d = 1.15, 95% CI: 142-448 N) than in 7 MW (PF: p = 0.030, d = 0.63, 95% CI: 17-315 N; MF: p = 0.026, d = 0.68, 95% CI: 23-332 N). No significant changes were observed in %BF, TC, RFDmax, or CMJ height.
The 7 MW-based program can improve aerobic capacity and muscular strength in active males, and BFR may further augment strength gains.

PMID:
42831085
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 92
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement