Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Building Shared Futures: Chemical Engineering and AI as Partners in Process Development.

Created on 05 Oct 2026

Authors

Jasmine J, Amgad S Moussa

Published in

Chimia. Volume 80. Issue 9. Pages 592-596. Sep 30, 2026. Epub Sep 30, 2026.

Abstract

Chemical engineering has evolved by adapting to available tools - from empirical correlations to simulation platforms and high-throughput experimentation. Each transition reshaped what was computationally and experimentally affordable, determining which problems received attention. Artificial intelligence introduces a new shift in this cost structure: specifically, the cost of building mechanistic models and extracting structured knowledge from unstructured data. This perspective argues that AI enables correction of two long-standing imbalances: the limited ability to distinguish exploratory (data-sparse) from exploitative (data-rich) problem modes, and an entrenched preference for experimentation over mechanistic reasoning. We propose a unified framework combining two complementary AI-enabled architectures - the Data Pipeline and the Insight Pipeline - and introduce a four-axis diagnostic for selecting between them based on physical-law knowability, data availability, regime novelty, and reliability constraints. In fine chemical manufacturing, where formalized physical understanding is valuable, yet scarce, large language models offer a practical path to accelerate know-how generation within this framework. A recommended workflow for large language model (LLM)-assisted modeling is outlined, emphasizing auditability, competing hypotheses, uncertainty quantification, and information-rich experimentation. We hope this supports a renewed modeling-first culture in chemical engineering.

PMID:
42831510
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement