Evaluation of Intervention Strategies to Improve Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Abnormal FIT/FOBT Result: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors

Wei Yu Chua, Luke Xavier Chew, Claire K M Chan, Zoe Tong, Lok Pui Ng, Cheng Ean Chee, Dawn Chong, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Priyanka Rajendram, Clarence K W Kwan, Andrew B E Kwek, Emile K W Tan, Sze Huey Tan, Lian Leng Low, Michael Pignone, Kennedy Y Y Ng

Published in

JAMA internal medicine. Oct 05, 2026. Epub Oct 05, 2026.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Early detection through screenings has been shown to improve morbidity and mortality. While fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or fecal occult blood test (FOBT) are established cost-effective screening modalities for colorectal cancer, follow-up colonoscopy screening rates remain suboptimal.
To evaluate interventions targeting colonoscopy completion and the prevalence of colonoscopy completion after an abnormal FIT/FOBT result.
MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to May 9, 2026, and the bibliographies of relevant studies were screened.
Original studies, published in English, examining nonrandomized interventional studies or randomized clinical trials comparing interventions to improve follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal FIT/FOBT result were included. Prevalence and risk ratios (RRs) with accompanying 95% CIs for each study were computed, and the results were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis.
This study was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Two authors reviewed each study and extracted the data independently, with discrepancies referred to a third independent author.
Outcomes included prevalence and RR of various interventions.
A total of 21 studies involving 19 613 patients (8101 female individuals [41.3%] and 11 512 male individuals [58.7%]; age range, 50-75 years) evaluating interventions to improve colonoscopy completion after an abnormal FIT/FOBT result were included. Patient navigation (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15-1.33; I2 = 57.1), patient reminders (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.67; I2 = 89.9), clinician reminders (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.12-1.65; I2 = 94.4), and automated referrals to gastrointestinal consult (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60; I2 = 91.9) were effective in increasing follow-up colonoscopy completion with moderate to high heterogeneity detected within and across intervention types. Sensitivity analyses excluding outliers resulted in low heterogeneity for patient navigation, patient reminders (messaging), and clinician reminders, while moderate heterogeneity remained for automated referrals. Follow-up colonoscopy increased from 4755 of 10 263 in control to 6272 of 9350 after interventions; pooled prevalence estimates were 47.8% and 69.1%, respectively.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, patient-level and system-level interventions, including patient navigation, patient reminders, and clinician reminders, are associated with increased completion of follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal FIT/FOBT result. More studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of automated referrals to gastrointestinal consult due to large heterogeneity between studies and to study the incremental effect of each intervention in multicomponent interventions.

PMID:
42832233
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.