Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Path-dependent viscoelastic-hyperelastic response of brain tissue under multistage shear loading.

Created on 06 Oct 2026

Authors

Hadi Nosrati, Mehdi Shafieian, Kurosh Darvish

Published in

Medical & biological engineering & computing. Oct 05, 2026. Epub Oct 05, 2026.

Abstract

Advancing computational models of repetitive traumatic brain injury (rTBI) requires understanding how prior loading alters the mechanical response of brain tissue. However, most previous studies have relied on single-stage loading or limited preconditioning protocols that do not capture path-dependent behavior. To bridge this gap, multistage simple shear experiments were performed on 14 bovine brain specimens. Successive ramp-and-hold and cyclic loading protocols examined the effects of loading mode, strain amplitude, and loading sequence within the reported sub-damaging loading range. Mechanical behavior was quantified using the shear modulus (μ) and Prony-series viscoelastic parameters (g₁-g₃, g∞). In the present experiments, prior cyclic loading generally reduced peak stress and shear modulus. From the initial to the final loading stage, μ decreased from 2.94 ± 0.94 to 2.49 ± 0.63 kPa, g₂ increased from 0.14 ± 0.19 to 0.19 ± 0.17, and g₃ decreased from 0.21 ± 0.08 to 0.16 ± 0.06 (all p < 0.05). In contrast, g₁ and g∞ showed no significant changes (p > 0.05). Cumulative strain was not significantly correlated with final μ (Spearman ρ = - 0.31, p > 0.05), whereas protocol sequence was associated with differences in μ within the investigated multistage loading histories. These findings demonstrate path- and sequence-dependent brain tissue mechanics that may inform constitutive models for repeated loading scenarios, including those relevant to rTBI.

PMID:
42832160
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 31
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement