Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A forecast-to-dispatch workflow for day-ahead operation of a regional natural gas transmission network based on station-level load prediction and linepack target setting.

Created on 06 Oct 2026

Authors

Ying Liu, Yong Xiao, Zhiping Tang, Simin Zhong, Chenguang Yong, Yuanyuan Tian

Published in

PloS one. Volume 21. Issue 10. Pages e0349981. Epub Oct 05, 2026.

Abstract

Day-ahead operation of regional natural gas transmission networks requires station demand forecasts and their translation into inventory-preparation references. This study evaluated a sequential forecast-to-dispatch workflow for the Chongqing regional gas network. Six forecasting models were assessed under a leakage-controlled 30-day walk-forward protocol. Across nine routine stations, mean station-level MAPE was 8.61% for SARIMAX, 8.95% for XGBoost, and 9.78% for GRU. The corresponding values were 10.93% for LSTM, 11.63% for BPNN, and 11.77% for CNN-BiLSTM-Attention. Station G was assessed separately as a data-quality boundary case; Station K was excluded because only 62 observations were available. An independent archived 18-day hourly dataset reported reconstruction MAPE of 6.7%-8.1% and peak-timing deviations of 1.0-1.5 h. A retrospective West-pipeline case for 22 April 2023 traced historical station forecasts through weighted aggregation, intermediate rounding, hourly reconstruction, and reduced-order linepack calculation. Its LFFX preparation target and the separate NGXDD and DLFX targets were 1.272, 4.702, and 1.571 × 10⁶ m³, respectively. All three targets passed case-specific deterministic inventory checks. The results support station-specific forecast-model selection and an explicit interface between daily prediction and segment-level inventory preparation.

PMID:
42832493
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement