Living-Moss Multimodal Biosensing for Urban Atmospheric Metal Burden: Laboratory Calibration and Field Evaluation.

Authors

Kaan Isinkaralar, Paweł Świsłowski, Oznur Isinkaralar, Małgorzata Rajfur, Antonio Cannuli

Published in

Environmental research. Pages 125855. Oct 05, 2026. Epub Oct 05, 2026.

Abstract

Atmospheric metal monitoring remains constrained by the sampling and analytical requirements of conventional methods. This study developed MossSense-HM, a living Hypnum cupressiforme-based multimodal sensing platform combining electrical impedance, optical reflectance, chlorophyll fluorescence, and microclimatic measurements to estimate accumulated metal burden. Laboratory exposures to Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn, Ni, and Cr at 25-200 μg cartridge^-1 over 72 h produced exposure-dependent responses. Electrical changes were detectable within 6-12 h at the two highest doses, providing an indication of stress before endpoint chemical analysis. Including temperature, relative humidity, and moss moisture improved XGBoost prediction of ICP-OES-derived metal burden, achieving test R² = 0.91 compared with 0.63-0.76 for individual sensing modalities. The Moss Biosensor Pollution Index (MBPI) correlated with measured metal burden (r = 0.89) and showed 86.5% category agreement (109/126) across laboratory observations, including calibration data. Independent evaluation at 30 sites during a 30-day deployment in Çankırı yielded R² = 0.84 (95% bootstrap CI: 0.73-0.91). Field MBPI categories agreed with training-derived ICP-OES pressure categories at 83.3% of sites (25/30; Wilson 95% CI: 66.4-92.7%). Traffic-, railway-, and industrial-influence sites showed higher responses and metal burdens than background environments. These findings support living-moss sensing as a complementary screening approach for prioritizing chemical analysis. Model performance and MBPI boundaries remain specific to the evaluated species, calibration conditions, and deployment period; transfer across cities, seasons, and species requires further validation.

PMID:
42833536
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.