Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Systemic Inflammatory Ratios Predict Survival in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Created on 06 Oct 2026

Authors

Idan Gavrielov, Alex Dobriyan, Idan Shavit, Marilena Vered

Published in

Oral diseases. Oct 05, 2026. Epub Oct 05, 2026.

Abstract

To investigate the prognostic value of the systemic inflammation-related biomarkers of neutrophil-lymphocyte, albumin-globulin, lymphocyte-monocyte, and platelet-lymphocyte ratios at three perioperative time points, and to explore their association with clinicopathologic features and disease-specific survival.
In 220 oral squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing surgery (2012-2023), we assessed risk factors, such as extranodal extension, TNM stage, and biomarker cutoffs (neutrophil-lymphocyte 5.0; albumin-globulin 1.21; lymphocyte-monocyte 3.14; platelet-lymphocyte 218.9). Disease-specific survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox multivariate models. Significance set at p < 0.05.
Biomarkers measured 3 months postoperatively were the strongest predictors. Multivariate analysis identified high neutrophil-lymphocyte (HR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.44-6.21; p = 0.003), low albumin-globulin (HR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.89; p = 0.023) ratios, and extranodal extension (HR = 3.17, 95% CI 1.54-6.52; p = 0.002) as independent predictors of poorer disease-specific survival. Importantly, neutrophil-lymphocyte prognostic impact was comparable to that of extranodal extension, a well-established pathological risk factor.
Three months post-surgery, high neutrophil-lymphocyte and low albumin-globulin ratios independently predict worse disease-specific survival in oral cancer. Neutrophil-lymphocyte, a simple and widely available biomarker, offers prognostic insight comparable to extranodal extension, supporting its integration into postoperative risk stratification and potentially guiding adjuvant therapy decisions.

PMID:
42834691
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement