Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Factors associated with perceived work ability among people working one year after stroke: an exploratory cross-sectional study.

Created on 06 Oct 2026

Authors

Ingrid Lindgren, Anna Norlander, Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen, Christina Brogårdh

Published in

Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Volume 58. Pages jrm45817. Oct 06, 2026. Epub Oct 06, 2026.

Abstract

Knowledge of factors contributing to sustained work ability after stroke is limited. This study explored the association between perceived work ability and personal, stroke-related and work-related factors.
Cross-sectional study.
Individuals working 1 year after stroke.
A postal survey was completed by 88 individuals. The survey comprised questions on demographics, personal, stroke-related and work-related factors, and a set of validated questionnaires including the Work Ability Index (WAI). Data were analysed using logistic regression analyses with perceived overall work ability (WAI item 1) as the dependent variable (good or excellent vs poor or moderate work ability).
Good or excellent work ability was perceived by 59% of the participants. In the final multivariable regression analyses, greater fatigue (OR 0.4; p < 0.001) and a poor work-life balance (OR 0.4; p < 0.005) were associated with lower odds for perceiving good or excellent work ability, whereas a higher monthly income (OR 5.8; p < 0.008) and greater mastery of work (OR 3.2; p < 0.007) were associated with higher odds.
Both stroke-related and work-related factors were associated with perceived work ability among individuals working 1 year after stroke. This indicates that several aspects need to be addressed to accomplish a sustainable work situation after stroke.

PMID:
42834638
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement