Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

21-Gene recurrence score assay in pN2-3 Early-Stage breast cancer: a national cancer database study.

Created on 06 Oct 2026

Authors

Carmine Valenza, Yue Zheng, José Pablo Leone, Dario Trapani, Pier Paolo Maria Berton Giachetti, Guilherme Nader-Marta, Laura S Dominici, Sara M Tolaney, Ann H Partridge, Giuseppe Curigliano, Meredith M Regan, Harold J Burstein

Published in

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Oct 06, 2026. Epub Oct 06, 2026.

Abstract

The clinical utility of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pN2-3 early-stage breast cancer (eBC) has not been evaluated in prospective trials. This study aims to assess adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in patients with pN2-3 eBC who underwent RS testing and had a RS ≤ 25.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) among patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative, pN2-3 eBC diagnosed from 2010-2020 who underwent 21-gene RS testing (OncotypeDX) and had RS ≤ 25. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who received or did not receive chemotherapy, using propensity score (PS)-weighted Cox regression.
Among 50,229 eligible patients with pN2-3 eBC, 3,110 (6%) underwent RS testing. Patients who underwent testing had longer OS than those who did not (5-year OS: 86% vs. 79%). Among tested patients, 2,058 (66%) had RS ≤ 25 (median: 15), and 68% of them received chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the PS-weighted hazard ratio for OS comparing chemotherapy to no chemotherapy was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.48-0.81; P = 0.0002; E-value: 2.13, 95% CI lower bound: 1.58).
In this cohort of highly selected patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative pN2-3 eBC who underwent 21-gene RS testing and had RS ≤ 25, patients who received chemotherapy had a longer OS compared to those who did not receive chemotherapy, despite having similar characteristics. These results should be interpreted with caution, as the presence of confounding by indication and residual confounding in this analysis underscores the need for randomized clinical trials in this population.

PMID:
42836707
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 18
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement