Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Exploratory thyroid ultrasound-computed tomography synthesis using anatomy-preserving contrastive unpaired translation.

Created on 06 Oct 2026

Authors

Enhui He, Yiran Wang, Zhanxiong Yi, Ying Feng, Zihong Cong, Zhixiang Wang

Published in

Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering. Oct 07, 2026. Epub Oct 07, 2026.

Abstract

When ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) are both clinically indicated, unpaired image translation may support model development but cannot replace either examination. We evaluated Anatomy-Preserving Contrastive Unpaired Translation (AP-CUT), a CUT-based framework with a CT-source Sobel edge-consistency term for CT → US translation.
The study used 832 malignant thyroid US images from TN5000 and 800 cervical CT slices from Head-Neck-CHUM. CycleGAN, CUT, and AP-CUT were compared with a low-dimensional Fréchet proxy and nearest-neighbor SSIM/PSNR. Bounding boxes were used only to prepare local US regions for qualitative US → CT examples. A separate single-run experiment treated 600 CT → US outputs as malignant-class training examples and evaluated three classifiers.
AP-CUT had the highest CT → US nearest-neighbor SSIM (0.1388), compared with 0.0982 for CUT and 0.1247 for CycleGAN. CycleGAN had the lowest US → CT proxy FID (10.4; lower is better). In the classification experiment, the absolute AUC change was +0.0002 for ResNet-50, +0.0261 for EfficientNet-B4 (0.7297 to 0.7558), and -0.0109 for EfficientNet-B4 + CBAM.
The CT-source regularizer improved one relative structural proxy over CUT, but absolute structural scores remained low. US → CT outputs are local CT-domain-styled patches rather than reconstructed axial CT images, and the mixed single-run classification results do not establish clinical utility.

PMID:
42836658
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement