Laparoscopic vs Open Ladd's Procedure: A Multicenter Study of Postoperative Volvulus and Small Bowel Obstruction Rate.

Authors

Stephanie F Brierley, Russell B Hawkins, Ryan Hare, Simone C Hyman, Benjamin A Keller, Aimee G Kim, Claudia Mueller, Lauren N Nicassio, David H Rothstein, Benjamin E Padilla, Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium Malrotation Group.

Published in

Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Oct 06, 2026. Epub Oct 06, 2026.

Abstract

Whether operative approach influences reoperation for postoperative volvulus or small bowel obstruction (SBO) after Ladd's procedure remains uncertain, with limited contemporary multicenter data outside administrative databases. We evaluated whether open vs laparoscopic Ladd's procedure was associated with differences in reoperation for postoperative volvulus and SBO.
This multicenter retrospective cohort included patients ≤15 years of age undergoing Ladd's procedure from January 2014 through September 2021 across 10 children's hospitals. Demographic, clinical, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes within 3 years were compared by operative approach. A multivariable logistic model assessed predictors of reoperation for postoperative SBO.
Among 697 patients, 495 (71.0%) underwent open and 202 (29.0%) laparoscopic Ladd's procedure; 72 laparoscopic cases (35.6%) were converted to open. Open patients were younger (1.7 months [IQR 0.2, 12.0] vs 9.5 months [IQR 2.0, 60.0], p<0.001) and more frequently had volvulus (31.0% vs 9.2%, p<0.001) and bowel resection (7.2% vs 0.0%, p=0.002). Reoperation for postoperative volvulus was uncommon (2.2%) and did not differ by approach. Reoperation for SBO was more frequent after open Ladd's (6.7% vs 1.5%, p=0.017). Laparoscopic approach was associated with lower adjusted odds of reoperation for SBO (OR 0.216 [95% CI 0.050, 0.934], p=0.040).
Reoperation for postoperative volvulus was uncommon and did not differ by operative approach. Laparoscopic Ladd's procedure was associated with lower reoperation for postoperative SBO compared with open operation.

PMID:
42836431
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.