Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of the spatial coherence of incident light on the Talbot and Lau self-images.

Created on 07 Oct 2026

Authors

Javad Arefitabar, Khosrow Hassani

Published in

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision. Volume 43. Issue 10. Pages 1638-1649. Oct 01, 2026.

Abstract

Using binary gratings as test objects, we quantitatively investigate the formation and visibility of the Talbot and Lau self-images under partially coherent illumination generated by a secondary Gaussian Schell-model source. The spatial coherence of the illuminating field is controlled through continuous variation of the source size, resulting in different fringe distributions in both regimes. Although the spatial coherence length varies according to a Lorentzian function with the source size, the visibility of the Talbot self-images exhibits an approximately Gaussian dependence, decreasing to 0.5 when the coherence length at the grating plane becomes nearly twice the grating pitch. In the Lau regime, the self-images remain sharp and clearly visible over a broad range of low-coherence illumination, as long as the coherence length remains below approximately twice the pitch of the first grating. However, when the coherence length becomes comparable to the grating pitch yet much smaller than the transverse width of the incident light field, the illumination becomes locally coherent over individual grating periods. Consequently, Fresnel diffraction features produced by the gratings appear within the main Lau self-image on the CCD plane, superimpose on the Lau fringes, and degrade their regular structure.

PMID:
42837601
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement