Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

γδ T Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy, 2000-2025: A Bibliometric Analysis and Clinical-Trial Evidence Map.

Created on 07 Oct 2026

Authors

Yuheng Wang, Yuanzhi He, Jiayu Xu, Yujia Wang, Hengjie Su, Yarong Zhang, Jiadi Lv, Hui Chen, Jing Wang

Published in

Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. Pages 105636. Oct 06, 2026. Epub Oct 06, 2026.

Abstract

γδ T cells are promising cancer-immunotherapy effectors because they recognize tumors without major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction and carry low graft-versus-host-disease risk in allogeneic settings, yet few bibliometric studies have integrated immunotherapy-specific research trends with clinical-trial mapping and translational-gap analysis. We characterized the global research output, intellectual foundations, emerging frontiers, and clinical translation of γδ T cells in cancer immunotherapy (2000-2025) by combining bibliometric analysis of 3,273 Web of Science publications (bibliometrix, VOSviewer, CiteSpace), a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR)-guided evidence map of 26 interventional cancer trials (ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform [WHO ICTRP], regional registries), and an integrative step linking bibliometric hotspots to the pipeline. Annual output grew from 18 (2000) to 418 (2024) publications (compound annual growth rate [CAGR], 14.0%) across three phases; China (33.1%) and the United States (27.3%) led production. Co-citation analysis identified five intellectual pillars: phosphoantigen recognition, subset heterogeneity, clinical adoptive transfer, tumor-microenvironment suppression, and engineered γδ T therapy. Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered γδ T cells (CAR-γδ T cells), allogeneic platforms, and single-cell RNA sequencing were the leading 2022-2025 frontier terms. Trials shifted toward allogeneic cell sources; early-phase studies consistently met safety and feasibility endpoints, but monotherapy efficacy was modest. The LAVA-051 and LAVA-1207 programs were discontinued for disclosed business or internal-benchmark reasons, whereas allogeneic CAR-Vδ1 therapy (ADI-001) produced the most encouraging early signals before oncology reprioritization in 2024. Three persistent translational gaps-single-cell/T-cell receptor (TCR) profiling, metabolic reprogramming, and γδT17 biology-frame a proposed roadmap to convert bibliometric hotspots into mechanism-guided γδ T-cell cancer immunotherapy.

PMID:
42838468
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement