Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Prevalence of malnutrition and the appropriateness of nutritional support among patients with hematologic malignancies: a GLIM-based study.

Created on 07 Oct 2026

Authors

Weiying Zhong, Xiamin Zhu, Fang Tang, Lan Xu

Published in

Frontiers in nutrition. Volume 13. Pages 1939731. Epub Sep 22, 2026.

Abstract

Malnutrition is common among patients with hematologic malignancies, but there are few clinical studies on disease-specific nutritional characteristics and the appropriateness of nutritional support.
This cross-sectional study included 633 hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies. Nutritional risk was assessed using the NRS-2002, malnutrition was diagnosed according to GLIM criteria, and the appropriateness of nutritional support was evaluated.
54.0% of patients were at nutritional risk, and 39.0% were diagnosed with malnutrition. Significant heterogeneity was observed across different disease subtypes, with multiple myeloma having the highest prevalence of nutritional risk (66.3%) and leukemia having the highest prevalence of malnutrition (44.9%). Female gender, diabetes, hypertension, elevated C-reactive protein, infection, and low serum albumin levels were independent risk factors associated with malnutrition. Only 15.6% of patients received nutritional support; fewer than one-third of malnourished patients received nutritional intervention, while 7.0% of well-nourished patients received nutritional support without clear indications.
There is significant heterogeneity in the nutritional status of hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies, and a marked mismatch exists between nutritional needs and nutritional support. Disease-specific nutritional management based on the GLIM assessment may improve the appropriateness of nutritional support and optimize clinical outcomes.

PMID:
42839928
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement