Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Deep lensless imaging with non-iterative output-constraint satisfaction.

Created on 07 Oct 2026

Authors

Shigeru Fujiwara, Hodaka Kawachi, José Reinaldo Cunha Santos A V Silva Neto, Yasushi Yagi, Tomoya Nakamura

Published in

Optics express. Volume 34. Issue 20. Pages 37137-37151. Oct 05, 2026.

Abstract

Deep learning enables high-quality single-pass reconstruction in computational lensless imaging, but its outputs generally do not satisfy the physical observation model y = Ax. Existing methods that enforce this constraint, such as iterative optimization and diffusion-based approaches, require repeated computation at inference, limiting their applicability in time-sensitive settings. We propose the output-constraint module (OCM), a lightweight add-on that projects the output of any deep learning reconstruction model onto the measurement-consistent subspace without iterative computation. The projection is derived analytically via Lagrange multipliers, yielding a closed-form expression that requires only matrix-vector products at inference. Applied to lensless image reconstruction, OCM reduces the data-consistency loss (the residual of the observation model) by approximately 3 × over unconstrained deep learning and achieves the best reconstruction quality among measurement-consistent single-pass methods, with inference approximately 9 × faster than iterative optimization (ADMM, 100 iterations). Our analysis indicates that the remaining gap in similarity to the paired lensed-camera images between data-driven and measurement-consistent methods largely reflects the mapping between the two camera domains that data-driven models learn implicitly, rather than a loss of scene information.

PMID:
42839418
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement