Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

pycmplot: fast, low-memory multi-track circular and linear Manhattan plotting in Python.

Created on 07 Oct 2026

Authors

Kevin Esoh, Fujr Osman, Cesar Fortes-Lima, Gordon A Awandare, Ambroise Wonkam

Published in

Bioinformatics advances. Volume 6. Issue 1. Pages vbag281. Epub Sep 22, 2026.

Abstract

Manhattan plots remain the standard visual summary for genome-wide association studies and other per-variant scans (iHS, FST, XP-EHH). Existing Manhattan visualization tools either lack multi-track support (gwaslab, qmplot, and qqman) or do not provide a Circos-style multi-track circular Manhattan view. CMplot (R) does, but its memory and runtime costs on multi-million-variant inputs are substantial.
We present pycmplot, a Python package for generating multi-track linear and Circos-style circular Manhattan plots from one or more GWAS summary statistics. On a 10-million-variant scan, pycmplot is 5.5× faster and uses ∼5× less memory than CMplot for linear Manhattan plotting, 1.6× faster (and 3× faster with optional pre-filtering) for circular Manhattan, and 7.7× faster for qq rendering. Multi-track comparisons of two summary statistics are 4.5× faster (linear) and 3.5× faster (circular) than CMplot's equivalent mode. Transparent hg18/hg19 → hg38 liftover lets users mix coordinate systems within a single plot, and a lightweight bundle of Ensembl GFF3 gene information files (hg19 and hg38) enables nearest gene annotation.
pycmplot is freely available under the MIT license at https://github.com/esohkevin/pycmplot; and from PyPI (pip install pycmplot). Documentation is at https://pycmplot.readthedocs.io.

PMID:
42841153
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement