Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Urgent need for cervical cancer screening emphasis and engagement strategies among rural LGBTQ+ individuals.

Created on 07 Oct 2026

Authors

Wiley D Jenkins, Vistrit Choudhary, Kyle W Miller, Priyanka Bhandari, Minjee Lee, Susan Olivo-Marston

Published in

Preventive medicine reports. Volume 71. Pages 103647. Epub Sep 24, 2026.

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a preventable cancer through the use of screening and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Even with the availability of screening and the HPV vaccine, disparities exist by geographic area (rural versus urban) and sexual orientation and gender identity. Due to stigma the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minorities (LGBTQ+) encounter in healthcare, they are less likely to engage in routine healthcare. This is compounded in the rural LGBTQ+ population because of additional barriers such as lack of access to care, lack of competent providers, and financial constraints. A recent study in LGBTQ+ individuals in rural central and Southern Illinois revealed that only 50% of individuals were compliant with cervical cancer screening. Barriers to screening included poor prior experiences, financial burden, and gender dysphoria. There are strategies that could be utilized to address the disparities that exist among rural LGBTQ+ individuals. These include enhancing medical and clinical education, enhancing workforce diversity, enhancing the clinical environment to promote health equity, and enhancing regulatory pressure to enhance LGBTQ+-specific education opportunities. These efforts will be critical in reducing the health disparities that exist in cervical cancer screening among the LGBTQ+ population.

PMID:
42840893
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement