Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Native collagen matrix plus PHMB antimicrobial in hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers: results from the PREPARE randomised controlled trial.

Created on 08 Oct 2026

Authors

Leandro Tapia Garcia, Jaminelli Banks, Manuel Rodriguez, Shawn M Cazzell, Joseph M Caporusso, Windy Cole, Dereck Shi, Emily Cook, Brianna Tramelli, Thomas E Serena

Published in

Journal of wound care. Volume 35. Issue 10. Pages 876-886. Oct 02, 2026. Epub Oct 02, 2026.

Abstract

PREPARE was a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial evaluating purified native type 1 collagen extracellular matrix plus polyhexamethylene biguanide (PCMP) with standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone in patients with hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).
Across 25 US sites, patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and hard-to-heal DFUs measuring 1-25cm2 were enrolled. Patients demonstrating ≥40 percent area reduction (PAR) during four weeks of screening were excluded to restrict the study population to those with hard-to-heal wounds. SoC included sharp debridement, saline cleansing, use of moisture-balancing dressings and offloading. The primary endpoint was complete wound closure within 12 weeks, confirmed two weeks later. Secondary endpoints included time to closure, PAR and adverse events (AEs).
A total of 170 patients were randomised (PCMP+SoC, n=96; SoC alone, n=74). Complete wound closure occurred in 42% of patients receiving PCMP+SoC versus 27% of patients receiving SoC alone (absolute difference 14.6%; 95% confidence interval: 0.15%, 27.9%; p=0.047). Mean PAR was greater with PCMP+SoC than with SoC alone (75.23% versus 58.06%, respectively). No AEs or serious AEs were attributed to PCMP.
In this study, use of PCMP+SoC significantly improved 12-week closure outcomes in patients with hard-to-heal DFUs compared with SoC alone, supporting its use as an adjunctive antimicrobial barrier for these types of wounds.

PMID:
42842703
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 18
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement