Authors
Yonghui Su, Jiaqi Ying, Zhuozhao Zhan, Tingting Wu, Yena Yu, Wanxin Gao, Yizi Zheng
Published in
JCO precision oncology. Volume 10. Issue 10. Pages e2600177. Epub Oct 07, 2026.
Abstract
The prognostic significance of multifocal and multicentric breast cancer (MMBC) with low tumor burden remains controversial, and adjuvant chemotherapy guidelines for these patients are lacking.
Female patients with cT1-T2 MMBC or unifocal breast cancer (UBC) diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 were identified from the SEER database. Propensity score matching (PSM) balanced baseline characteristics. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, with subgroup analyses stratified by tumor size in node-negative MMBC.
After PSM, 9,751 matched pairs of patients with MMBC and UBC were included. Analyses showed MMBC had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) than UBC (both P < .001). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed chemotherapy improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.583 [95% CI, 0.522 to 0.652]) and BCSS (HR, 0.830 [95% CI, 0.702 to 0.980]) in MMBC. In eligible cases, 1,731 matched pairs with and without chemotherapy were identified. Subgroup analyses showed that in node-negative MMBC, chemotherapy improved OS only when tumors were ≥1 cm (tumor <1 cm: HR, 0.804 [95% CI, 0.506 to 1.275], P = .353; 1-2 cm: HR, 0.577 [95% CI, 0.414 to 0.806], P = .001; ≥2 cm: HR, 0.535 [95% CI, 0.399 to 0.717], P < .001).
MMBC predicts poorer survival than UBC. In node-negative MMBC, chemotherapy confers benefit only when tumor size is ≥1 cm, suggesting multifocality and multicentricity should guide chemotherapy decisions. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm findings and refine guidelines.
PMID:
42842843
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 23
- Comments 0