Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Survival after resection compared to no resection among octogenarians with pancreatic and periampullary malignancies: a nationwide study.

Created on 08 Oct 2026

Authors

Karin Johansen, Jacob Freedman, Dennis Björk, Per Sandström, Bergthor Björnsson

Published in

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association. Sep 25, 2026. Epub Sep 25, 2026.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare survival after surgery among elderly patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumours with patients who were offered resection but declined.
Data were obtained from the Swedish national registry for tumours in the pancreatic and periampullary region 2010-2022 for patients ≥80 years. Patients were excluded who were not eligible for upfront resection or who had missing data regarding treatment decision. Remaining patients were compared between one group that underwent surgery and one group that was offered surgery but declined.
Out of 3991 patients, 467 remained after the selection, of whom 360 underwent surgery and 107 declined. Patients who declined surgery were a median two years older and had higher rates of pulmonary disease, peptic ulcer disease and heart failure. Charlson Comorbidity Index was comparable between groups. The median overall survival was 2.2 years after surgery and 0.8 years without surgery. Significant factors in the multivariable analysis for overall survival were surgery, age and diagnosis.
The group undergoing surgery had significantly longer overall survival, although this must be interpreted in the light of baseline differences between groups and possible selection bias. This study may serve as an aid for preoperative counseling.

PMID:
42844053
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement