Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A data integration framework to improve the efficiency of survival analysis by leveraging multiple external studies with multifaceted heterogeneity.

Created on 08 Oct 2026

Authors

Daxuan Deng, Chixiang Chen, Lijun Zhang, Vernon M Chinchilli, Ming Wang

Published in

Biostatistics (Oxford, England). Volume 27. Issue 1. Jan 20, 2026.

Abstract

In survival analysis, integrating multiple data sources holds significant potential to increase event counts, improve statistical efficiency, and enhance scientific discovery. However, challenges arise when external datasets differ in data forms, distributions, and covariate availability. We propose a novel learning framework that strengthens statistical inference of internal Cox regression coefficients through efficient data integration. Our framework is robust integration and accommodates multifaceted data heterogeneity through transformation, working models, penalized approach, and weighting that adaptively selects homogeneous components. The resulting estimators are consistent, asymptotically normal, more efficient than internal-only estimators, and robust to working model misspecification and data heterogeneity. Simulation studies confirm our framework's favorable properties. We applied our method to study dementia risk among black individuals in the Religious Orders Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project, integrating information from external cohorts, including the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. The analysis identified key risk factors with improved efficiency and demonstrated clinical relevance.

PMID:
42843980
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement