Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Loneliness and stress among Chinese delivery gig workers: the moderating role of job identity.

Created on 08 Oct 2026

Authors

Hao Wen, Zhan Yu, Anao Zhang

Published in

International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE. Pages 1-7. Oct 07, 2026. Epub Oct 07, 2026.

Abstract

This study examined the association between loneliness and perceived stress among delivery gig workers in urban China and tested whether job identity moderates this association, addressing limited attention to mental health in China's expanding gig economy.
Using cross-sectional data collected June-August 2024 from 264 full-time delivery gig workers in Shanghai and Xi'an, ordinary least squares regression was conducted with eight demographic and work-related covariates, including hukou and city. Loneliness and job identity were mean-centered before creating the interaction term. Fisher's r-to-z subgroup comparisons further validated the moderation.
Loneliness was positively associated with perceived stress (β = 0.403, p < 0.001), and job identity was negatively associated with stress (β = -0.082, p < 0.05). A significant interaction (β = -0.127, p < 0.001) indicated that higher job identity attenuated the loneliness-stress association, with the association strongest among workers reporting lower job identity.
Higher job identity is associated with a weaker loneliness-stress association among delivery gig workers. Interventions strengthening job identity and work-based belonging may reduce stress in precarious gig work. Platforms, policymakers and practitioners should promote identity formation, algorithmic transparency and expanded social insurance coverage.

PMID:
42844009
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement