Understanding research practices and methodological choices when applying the Person-Based Approach to health intervention development: A qualitative interview study.

Authors

Lydia Holt, Sarah Denford, Lucy Yardley

Published in

BMJ open. Volume 16. Issue 10. Pages e112780. Oct 07, 2026. Epub Oct 07, 2026.

Abstract

This study explores why researchers selected the Person-Based Approach (PBA) to intervention development for their studies and their perceptions of the strengths and limitations of using the approach in practice.
This is a qualitative interview study, which uses an Interpretive Description approach to thematically analyse data.
The participants were based at academic institutions across the UK, Europe and North America.
We interviewed 16 health researchers at different academic career stages, including clinicians, psychologists and social scientists.
Three main themes were chosen to characterise and describe the data: Navigation (the PBA provided guidance throughout key development phases, and a clear audit-trail of research decisions); Flexibility (the PBA enabled study teams to make resource-responsive adaptations to their research methods, while maintaining the core principle of user focus) and Integration (the PBA facilitated the synthesis of diverse evidence sources and the combination of different development methodologies/frameworks).
Using the PBA gave researchers the confidence to adapt their research activities, particularly patient and public involvement and qualitative methods, to better reach target users. They selected the PBA not purely on instrumental grounds, but because it aligned with their professional values and commitment to user-centred practice. The PBA also facilitated the integration of multiple evidence sources and development frameworks. Understanding whether these diverse methodological configurations lead to successful outcomes will require evaluation approaches that can accommodate complexity and pluralism, alongside transparent reporting of the choices made.

PMID:
42843874
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.