The Effectiveness of Preoperative Liquid Diets on Bariatric Surgery Outcomes.

Authors

Shivani Desai, Androw Abdelnour, Braelyn Webb, Ellaree Estes, Dawn Blackhurst, John Scott

Published in

The American surgeon. Pages 31348261495987. Oct 07, 2026. Epub Oct 07, 2026.

Abstract

BackgroundEffects of preoperative weight loss on bariatric surgery outcomes have been previously studied, but the true association remains unclear. We aim to determine whether duration of a standardized preoperative liquid diet has significant effects on postoperative outcomes.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 576 patients categorized by preoperative diet duration (2-week vs 4-week). Differences in characteristics were assessed using Pearson Chi-square test for categorical variables and Student's t-test for independent groups for continuous data. Least squares multivariable linear regression modeling was used to assess predictors of total body weight loss percentage (TBWL%) at 1 year with TBWL% at 30 days and 1 year as primary endpoints.ResultsFive-hundred and seventy-six patients were analyzed, with 516 undergoing initial bariatric surgery. Ninety-three patients were enrolled in the 2-week liquid diet; 419 patients were enrolled in the 4-week diet. Patients in the 4-week group lost significantly more weight during the preoperative phase (P < 0.001). There was no difference between 2-week and 4-week diets on TBWL% at 30 days or 1 year. Five-hundred and twelve patients had follow-up at 1 year with age (P = 0.001) and race (P < 0.001) of the only significant predictors of TBWL% at 1 year.ConclusionIn this retrospective, non-randomized cohort, extending the preoperative liquid diet from 2 to 4 weeks did not result in improved postoperative weight loss at 30 days or 1 year. Age and race were the only significant predictors of TBWL% at 1 year in our cohort, underscoring the importance of patient-level biologic and social determinants.

PMID:
42843819
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.