Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Impact of Systematic Discontinuation of Mitomycin C HIPEC for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases on Oncologic Outcomes: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Created on 08 Oct 2026

Authors

M Daniyal Tanweer, Muhammad Talha Waheed, Isaac B Paz, Thinzar Lwin, Hamza Mohammed, Laleh Melstrom, Yuman Fong, Gagandeep Brar, Dani Castillo, Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi, Marwan Fakih, Mustafa Raoof

Published in

Annals of surgical oncology. Oct 07, 2026. Epub Oct 07, 2026.

Abstract

The PRODIGE7 trial demonstrated a lack of effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM), prompting many centers to transition to mitomycin C (MMC)-based HIPEC. However, the oncologic benefit of MMC-HIPEC remains unclear.
In 2021, our  center systematically discontinued HIPEC for CRC-PM. We  retrospectively compared consecutive patients who underwent MMC-HIPEC after complete CRS (2009-2021) with those undergoing CRS alone (2021-2024). Outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), peritoneal RFS, and 90-day postoperative outcomes. Propensity score-matching was performed using age, sex, primary tumor location, extraperitoneal disease, completeness of cytoreduction score, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, and preoperative chemotherapy.
The study included 107 consecutive patients (median age, 56 years; median peritoneal carcinomatosis index [PCI], 8; 48% male; 45% left-sided primary tumor), 68 (64%) of whom underwent CRS-HIPEC with MMC. Most of the patients (75%) experienced recurrence. After matching, 96 patients remained (32 treated with CRS alone; 64 treated with CRS-HIPEC). Between CRS alone and CRS-HIPEC, RFS was comparable (median, 8.4 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 5.6-12.7 months] vs. 8.7 months [95% CI, 6.2-11.0 months]; p = 0.527), as was peritoneal RFS (median 12.7 months [95% CI, 8.4-not reached {NR}] vs. 14.2 [95% CI, 8.7-19.8 months]; p = 0.806). The CRS-HIPEC patients had more respiratory complications (0% vs. 13%; p = 0.037) and longer hospital stays (median, 10 vs. 7 days; p < 0.001). Exploratory analyses suggested benefit in node-negative disease.
Omission of MMC-HIPEC did not compromise oncologic outcomes.

PMID:
42844527
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement