Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cell dynamics on energy landscape: Comparing attractor detection in Boolean network and diffusion-based models under in silico gene perturbations.

Created on 08 Oct 2026

Authors

Lingyu Li, Liangjie Sun, Shumin Li, Wai-Ki Ching, Zhi-Ping Liu

Published in

Quantitative biology (Beijing, China). Volume 14. Issue 4. Pages e70056. Epub Sep 23, 2026.

Abstract

Steady-state attractor detection differs fundamentally between discrete Boolean network (BN) and continuous diffusion-based models because they operate on different state spaces and exhibit distinct dynamic behaviors. Here, we propose cell dynamics on energy landscape (CellLand) to systematically compare BN and diffusion-based approaches for quantifying cellular dynamics on the energy landscape, with a particular focus on attractor identification under in silico gene perturbations. Although the energy landscape provides a unifying conceptual framework, BN-based models face specific challenges, including state space explosion and pronounced sensitivity to network architecture, when assessing attractor stability and transition accessibility. Nevertheless, BN-based analyses can remain reliable and interpretable when the underlying network topology is suitable, while being comparatively less sensitive to parameter estimation uncertainty and technical noise. Importantly, we show that attractor identification depends critically on network structure, and that no general theory currently exists for optimizing BN topology for dynamic cell-state modeling. Our findings deepen the comparative understanding of BN and diffusion-based frameworks and provide practical guidelines for selecting and designing models for robust simulation of complex gene-regulatory systems under perturbations.

PMID:
42845656
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement