Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Antagonistic Pleiotropy at the HCAR1 Locus Reveals a Genetic Basis for Solid Tumor Resistance in Schizophrenia.

Created on 08 Oct 2026

Authors

Bryan A Krantz

Published in

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences. Aug 10, 2026. Epub Aug 10, 2026.

Abstract

Historic epidemiological studies have long observed a paradoxical resistance to solid tumors in cohorts with severe psychiatric conditions, such as schizophrenia (SCZ), despite higher prevalences of lifestyle risk factors. Concurrently, oncology has established that solid tumors utilize Warburg glycolysis to generate a "lactate shield," binding the HCAR1 receptor on infiltrating macrophages to suppress immune proliferation. Here, we identify the shared genomic etiology resolving this paradox. Utilizing cross-trait genome-wide association studies (GWAS), we demonstrate that solid tumors exhibit an absolute mutational avoidance (a "statistical desert") at the HCAR1 locus, relying entirely on the host's intact baseline receptor for immune evasion. By contrast, the SCZ cohort harbors massive structural variance at this exact 3' regulatory enhancer for HCAR1 . Cross-referencing SCZ risk alleles against pan-UK Biobank oncology data reveals profound antagonistic pleiotropy: the identical HCAR1 enhancer fractures driving psychotic susceptibility mathematically reduce the risk of colorectal, breast, and melanoma cancers. We propose that the SCZ mutational burden renders peripheral macrophages transcriptomically "lactate blind," preventing the tumor from engaging the immune brake and effectively conferring a hardcoded, genetic immunotherapy against solid malignancies.

PMID:
42845507
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement