Authors
Xuan Zhang, Yunyi Jia, Di Tian, Xiaojie Zou, Deshen Mao, Fangyuan Zhang, Jian Cheng, Zhengyu Gu
Published in
Frontiers in public health. Volume 14. Pages 1926405. Epub Sep 23, 2026.
Abstract
Ambient air pollutants can directly act on the conjunctiva, triggering or exacerbating conjunctivitis. Nevertheless, evidence regarding the effects of common air pollutants on conjunctiva remains limited.
We collected 73,043 outpatient records of conjunctivitis visits to hospitals in Hefei from 2014 to 2023. A time-series study was adopted to investigate the short-term associations between five common air pollutants [i.e., aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 μm (PM₂.₅), particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤10 μm (PM₁₀), ozone (O₃), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), and sulfur dioxide (SO₂) and the risk of outpatient visits for conjunctivitis]. Furthermore, we explored the potential effect modification by gender, age, season, and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Exposures to all five ambient air pollutants were positively associated with elevated daily outpatient visit risks for conjunctivitis, with the strongest single-day effects generally observed on the concurrent day of exposure (lag 0), while cumulative analyses indicated pollutant-specific short-term lag patterns. The magnitude of associations varied across pollutants; SO₂ showed the largest lag-0 effect estimate, followed by NO₂. Stratified analyses further revealed that season, gender, age, and study period modified the pollutant-conjunctivitis associations to varying degrees.
This study found that short-term exposure to PM2.5, PM₁₀, O₃, NO₂, and SO₂ was associated with increased outpatient visits for conjunctivitis, with evident subgroup heterogeneity. These findings may have implications for clinical practice and public health in the prevention of eye diseases against air pollution.
PMID:
42845995
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 5
- Comments 0