Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Intraoperative Trajectory Realignment Algorithm for Minimizing Screw Misplacement in Cervical Spinal Fusion.

Created on 08 Oct 2026

Authors

Pasit Komonsuwan, Jackrit Suthakorn, Shen Treratanakulchai, Sorayouth Chumnanvej

Published in

Computational and structural biotechnology journal. Volume 35. Issue 2. Pages 0222. Epub Oct 07, 2026.

Abstract

Spinal fusion is a surgical procedure designed to stabilize the spine by connecting vertebrae with screws and rods, where placement accuracy is critical, as even small deviations can cause severe neurovascular complications. The accuracy of traditional preoperative image-based navigation is limited by intraoperative alignment shifts, particularly in the highly mobile cervical spine. This study presents an intraoperative trajectory realignment algorithm that reconciles preoperative computed tomography data with simulated and phantom-derived intraoperative 2-dimensional (2D) projections by integrating forward kinematics, digitally reconstructed radiographs, and optimization-based search strategies. The algorithm was evaluated through computational simulations and physical experiments using a modular 3D-printed cervical spine phantom, with accuracy evaluated through clinical grading and assessment metrics, including entry/end point displacement, angular deviation, and minimum inter-trajectory distance. Results demonstrated high accuracy, with all screws graded as perfectly placed and deviations consistently below clinically relevant thresholds. While these findings confirm the feasibility of this approach under controlled experimental conditions, future validation using cadaveric models and real intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging remains necessary prior to clinical integration.

PMID:
42846124
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement