Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Dissociating stimulus and task effects on neural oscillations during n-back tasks.

Created on 08 Oct 2026

Authors

Jaap Munneke, Elnaz Vafaei, Jahla B Osborne, Mahsa Shalchy, Susanne M Jaeggi, Aaron Seitz

Published in

Frontiers in human neuroscience. Volume 20. Pages 1883989. Epub Sep 23, 2026.

Abstract

N-back tasks are widely used to assess working memory functioning, yet different methodological approaches between tasks and across laboratories can yield distinct neural signatures. While working memory-related event-related potentials (ERPs) have been extensively studied, it remains unclear how task parameters influence the neural oscillatory activity underlying working memory functioning.
We conducted time-frequency analyses on EEG data from 36 participants performing nine different variants of the n-back task that systematically varied in stimulus type (words, pictures, colors) and task structure (timing, response, and feedback parameters). We examined power modulations in the theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), and beta (12-30 Hz) frequency bands to determine which task parameters drive changes in specific neural oscillations.
Results revealed a functional double dissociation: frontal theta event-related synchronization was selectively sensitive to stimulus type, with 'pictures' eliciting greater theta power than words and colors in the task variant with the shortest total trial duration and a requirement to respond to all stimuli, but not in other task variants. In contrast, centro-parietal alpha event-related desynchronization was driven predominantly by task structure rather than stimulus content, showing reduced alpha suppression in the task variant characterized by the longest inter-trial interval and immediate accuracy feedback. Beta oscillations showed no systematic modulation at the Region of Interest level. Cluster-based permutation analyses further confirmed the early temporal specificity of both theta and alpha effects.
We conclude that theta oscillations reflect stimulus-driven encoding demands, while alpha desynchronization tracks the structural and temporal demands of the task context (modulating the need for active neural inhibition of task-irrelevant information). These findings have direct implications for standardizing n-back protocols: stimulus type and task structure exert their influence on fundamentally different oscillatory systems and must be carefully controlled depending on which neural biomarker is targeted.

PMID:
42845971
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement