Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Direct and indirect associations of management support with compliance with laboratory safety policies: the mediating roles of perceived trust and self-efficacy.

Created on 08 Oct 2026

Authors

Lihui Hong, Keda Yang, Jie Qu

Published in

Frontiers in public health. Volume 14. Pages 1918077. Epub Sep 23, 2026.

Abstract

Laboratory safety policies (LSP) are critical for ensuring the safety of research environments. Although studies have explored compliance with information security policies, user compliance behavior with laboratory safety policies remains under-explored.
This study investigates the associations of Management Support (MS) with compliance with LSP, including direct and indirect pathways through Self-efficacy (SE) and Perceived Trust (PT), using data from 510 university biomedical laboratory users (93.72% of whom were undergraduates). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to analyse the direct and indirect associations.
MS showed a significant direct association with user compliance behavior (UCB) (β = 0.247, p = 0.003) and significant indirect associations via PT (indirect β = 0.332) and SE (indirect β = 0.198), supporting partial mediation.
The indirect association via PT was numerically larger than that via SE (indirect β = 0.332 vs. 0.198). However, a bootstrap test of the difference between the two indirect effects (5,000 sub-samples) yielded a 95% confidence interval of [-0.117, 0.465], which includes zero, indicating that the difference was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, both indirect pathways were significant, underscoring the importance of both institutional trust and self-efficacy in promoting laboratory safety compliance.

PMID:
42845820
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement