Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Longer-term outcomes of intravitreal therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration at a peripheral centre (Palmerston North eye clinic).

Created on 09 Oct 2026

Authors

Brandon Nunns, Aqeeda Singh, John Ah-Chan

Published in

The New Zealand medical journal. Volume 139. Issue 1643. Pages 24-31. Oct 09, 2026. Epub Oct 09, 2026.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term real-world outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) at a regional New Zealand centre, with a primary focus on treatment duration and reasons for cessation.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Palmerston North eye clinic, including all newly diagnosed eyes with nAMD initiating anti-VEGF therapy between November 2017 and August 2023. Demographic data, visual acuity, treatment duration and documented reasons for cessation were extracted from a prospectively maintained database and validated against electronic health records.
Among 527 eyes from 446 patients, 39.8% ceased treatment. The most common reasons were end-stage disease (44.8%), patient death (21.9%), logistical factors (17.6%) and injection intolerance (8.1%). Mean treatment duration was 421 days. Visual outcomes were favourable overall with 20.2% of eyes improving and 59.5% remaining stable. Better baseline visual acuity strongly predicted better final vision.
High early cessation due to end-stage disease suggests possible late presentation, underscoring the need for earlier detection and referral. Addressing logistical barriers and supporting adherence will be increasingly important as demand for anti-VEGF therapy grows with an ageing population.

PMID:
42849000
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement