Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Nested named entity recognition in Chinese electronic medical records enhanced by part-of-speech and entity boundary knowledge.

Created on 09 Oct 2026

Authors

Jianmei Wang, Yupeng Liao, Zhaoben Xie, Yongqiang Zhang

Published in

Health informatics journal. Volume 32. Issue 4. Pages 14604582261495320. Epub Oct 08, 2026.

Abstract

ObjectiveNested named entity recognition in Chinese electronic medical records (EMRs) is challenging because entity spans overlap and have ambiguous boundaries. We evaluated whether part-of-speech (POS) cues and automatically extracted entity boundary knowledge could improve a RoBERTa-GlobalPointer framework for this task.MethodsThis retrospective study used public, de-identified benchmark datasets. We evaluated a RoBERTa-wwm-ext-large-GlobalPointer framework with two enhancement branches: token-aligned POS embeddings derived from jieba. posseg and an entity boundary knowledge base (EBKB) constructed from entity head, tail and length patterns. The primary experiment used Chinese Medical Entity Extraction version 2 (CMeEE-V2), and supplementary test-set analyses used cEHRNER and CCKS2019.ResultsOn the CMeEE-V2 test set, the best configuration achieved 72.45% precision, 73.02% recall and 72.60% F1, outperforming the comparators. Ablation results indicated that boundary knowledge was the principal source of improvement, whereas POS features had a smaller effect. The cEHRNER test-set analysis provided additional cross-dataset evidence. Across five CCKS2019 test-set runs, F1 was 0.8152 ± 0.0096 for the knowledge-enhanced model and 0.7054 ± 0.0435 for the baseline (paired p=0.0043).ConclusionAutomatically extracted boundary knowledge was the main driver of improvement in the framework, while POS features acted as auxiliary cues. Findings were consistent across primary and supplementary test-set evaluations.

PMID:
42849033
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Oct 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement